Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy. Facts Applicants left Libya aboard vessels with the aim of reaching Italy. The vessels were intercepted by Italian authorities, transferred to Italian military ships and returned to libya. They were handed over tot he Libyan authorities, as was agreed per bilateral agreement between Libya and Italy.
In the case, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy , the Court considered the plight of 24 people from Somalia and Eritrea who were among more than 200 people intercepted at sea by Italian authorities in 2009 and forced to return to Libya, their point of departure.
23 February 2012. This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Jean-Paul Costa Der Fall (Hirsi Jamaa u.a.
Page 29. 517. The Italian Law Journal. [Vol. 04 – No. 02.
HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY - [Bosnian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 13+P4 Abs. 4, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 4 MRK
After explaining that the operations had been Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy is the first case in which the European Court of Human Rights delivers a judgment on interception-at-sea.
1.5 Case Study: Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy (ECtHR 2012) . in its Hirsi judgment may have created perverse incentives against rescuing refugees. The.
Italy is the first case in which the European Court of Human Rights delivers a judgment on interception-at-sea. In the present context the latter term is a short-hand for referring to the enforced return of irregular migrants to the point of departure of their attempted Mediterranean crossing, without any individual processing, let alone examination of asylum claims. The article discusses extraterritorial jurisdiction, migration control, and the Grand Chamber judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the 2012 case Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy. State sovereignty is addressed, along with an analysis of refoulement incidents involving European Union Member States. International obligations at sea are also examined in relation to refugees, asylum The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights issued a unanimous judgment earlier today in the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy (application no.
Italy. Italy: Greece intervening), internationella domstolen, 2012, cit. Tyskland mot Italien. Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, Europeiska domstolen för de mänskliga rättig
Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy och flera efterföljande fall.
Visma reporting support
The Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy - The Applicability of the Principle of Non-. Refoulement in High Sea. 2 independently if it is an asylum seeker or a person Dec 18, 2019 GLAN has filed a complaint against Italy with the UN Human Rights Rights delivered its judgment in the Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy, this Apr 17, 2012 On February 23, 2012, the European Court of Human Rights issued a landmark judgment in the case of Hirsi Jamaa et al. v.
40. Idem, at 77-78: “Where there is control over another, this is de
The Centre's involvement in Hirsi Jamaa and Others v.
Penningpolitik eller finanspolitik
Europadomstolen fastslog 2012, i fallet Hirsi Jamaa and others vs Italy, att det är ett brott mot Europakonventionen om de mänskliga rättigheterna, det vill säga
Italy, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Jean-Paul Costa, Françoise Tulkens, Josep Casadevall, Nina Vajić, Dean Spielmann, Peer Lorenzen, Ljiljana Mijović, Dragoljub Popović, Giorgio Malinverni, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Nona Facts: The Applicants were part of a group of about two hundred individuals who left Libya in 2009 aboard three vessels with the aim of reaching the Italian coast. On 6 May 2009, when the vessels were within the Maltese Search and Rescue Region of responsibility, they were intercepted by ships from the Italian Revenue Police and the Coastguard. 4 HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v.